Showing posts with label war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 March 2026

Why My Lai still matters

My last post was written on the 16th of March, because of what is going on in the world the date has triggered a memory, one that is usually forgotten or more likely hidden under the psychic floorboards of our Western mind. On March 16, 1968, American soldiers from Charlie Company entered the Vietnamese hamlet of My Lai and what would happen would change the way we thought of ourselves.

Like many people, I found out about what happened on the 30th of November 1969, I was at the time a young art student on the Wolverhampton Pre-Diploma course and just as I am now and have done almost all of my working life, I was searching for what I ought to be making artwork about. I used at that time to listen to Alister Cooke's 'Letter From America', I loved his comforting voice and take on life, he seemed humane and deeply insightful as to what was happening in a country that always seemed to culturally lead into places where we would follow and especially if like myself you were an art student, all the interesting new directions in art practice seemed to emerge from New York.

This is a quote from Cooke's broadcast:

...it's not often possible to say that a whole nation is haunted at any one time by a single preoccupation. This is one of those times. I don’t think there is any need to go into the details of the ghastly and deliberate massacre of a village and all its inhabitants in South Vietnam, which has only now come to light.

It’s a story of almost numbing horror; what haunts Americans this weekend is why they haven’t been numbed long ago. For though the story is, no doubt, detailed and complicated and will be straightened out in the coming courts martial, the moral issue is horribly simple, it’s been there for several years, and it ought to have plagued us long before this.

Only in the last few days has it been brought home to people that the massacre at Son My is not an isolated incident but simply a brazen variation on a regular policy of modern war. In spite of President Nixon’s regretful statement to the effect that the massacre violated the American rules of war, the truth had already anticipated him; that the men of Company C 1st Battalion 20th Infantry, did with rifles what the air force and the artillery had been doing for years, as standard procedure – namely wiping out the people of any village that were suspected of harbouring, or being under the control of, the Vietcong.


At the end of his broadcast Cooke had this to say:

...the moral riddle will not go away. Is it valiant to bomb a hundred women and children from the air, and despicable to shoot them on the ground? I leave it to you, and don’t care to stay for an answer.

I was at the time deeply affected by the news and I tried to make artwork about what I had heard, but it was of course totally useless and poor, my tutors at the time advising me to make work about something I had directly experienced and they were right, I had no visualisation skills of the order needed to make sense of what I had heard. It needed an artist of the calibre of Goya to say anything of meaning in a situation of this sort.
Recently I have again been writing about the development of a moral framework out of which I try to develop an art practice and alongside that a life. For instance in my last post I was thinking about how the holding of drawn conversations could develop empathy for other people and help us learn from them. I was also trying to articulate a need to develop conversations with plants and other things, if we are to thoughtfully embrace and care for the wider world we inhabit. Without a moral compass we are all lost and our current global condition, suggests that that compass is broken or temporarily lost. Therefore I feel I need to remind myself, of what can happen if we lose track of what it is to be a humane being. The word 'humane' is defined as showing kindness, care and sympathy towards others, especially those who are suffering. Its etymological roots remind us that 'humane' was used in the mid-15th century as a word for both being human and being kind and refined, it had evolved out of the Latin 'hūmānus', meaning "of man, human," which also encompassed the idea that to be 'of a human nature' was to be also "kind, gentle, polite or refined". Humane therefore shares its roots with the word 'human', but it diverged in the 18th century to specifically denote compassion and benevolence, separating itself from the earlier meaning of being a human. Today a 'human' is defined as being a member of the species homo sapiens, that belongs to the family Hominidae (the great apes) and is characterised by hairlessness, obligate bipedality, manual dexterity with opposable thumbs precision grip, and high intelligence. As we have developed a more scientific awareness of ourselves, it would seem we have uncoupled an earlier awareness of our moral capacity to be kind or gentle, becoming 'only human'.

On March 16, 1968, American soldiers destroyed the Vietnamese hamlet of My Lai. Vernon Janick, a former US soldier when reminiscing about the way he was trained for service in Vietnam stated that, "we were trained that they were more animal than anything. You just didn’t trust any of them. We were always told that kids or women were just as much your enemy as anybody else. We never trusted any of them. I already hated them before I went over there. ...You always thought they were snakes - sneaky, which they are. Slant-eyed people, you couldn’t trust them." Janick's observations remind us that wars are not just fought with the weapons of combat, they are fought with language and imagery; how the enemy is shaped by the stories we tell, determines how far we are justified in our actions and how far those actions themselves might become divorced from any form of morality. We must never forget that Nazi propaganda used dehumanising language to describe Jews, portraying them as subhuman and parasitic, eventually calling them vermin, rats and disease-carrying agents. This rhetoric would eventually persuade ordinary people to take part in actions that would lead to the mass murder of millions. The shockwaves of that holocaust still propagate the current disturbances. The State of Isreal founded in 1948 was in many ways, a result of that horror. After discovering the extent of Nazi atrocities people in the Western World that thought they were civilised had to confront a realisation that one of the most 'civilised' nations could fall into barbarism. No nation, it seemed was immune to the committing of atrocities. When language is distorted, eventually moral failure emerges. Isreal it could be argued, evolved out of a collective guilt. After many years of unrest, on the 7th October 2023, Hamas and the Palestine Islamic Jihad, attacked Israeli civilian communities including attendees at the Nova Music Festival, where some 400 young Israeli civilians were murdered. On that day 1,189 civilians were not just killed, they were often mutilated and the perpetrators documented their own atrocities using live-streaming body cameras. We are now having to live with the consequences, consequences taken to such extremes that at the present count almost ten percent of the Palestinian population of Gaza have been killed. Barbarism incites barbarism.


The original UN approved map of the new state of Isreal

The proposal lines on a map can in future become a war zone. What at one time is a map of conjecture at another becomes a certainty. These drawings change the world; all maps are political.
Recently the United States Secretary of War, has described the ruling regime in Iran as a "death cult” driven by "prophetic Islamist delusions.” A description that suggests that the state of Iran, as far as the Secretary of War is concerned, is morally illegitimate and therefore war is the only reasonable response. This creates an idea in people's minds that it is a good thing to go to war, as Iran is an evil that needs destroying. He recently recited Psalm 144: "Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle.", as justification for his stance.
This matters because it changes how people think. Iran is no longer a state that can be negotiated with, it is now a threat that lies outside the normal rules of political exchange. This type of language, as used by the United States Secretary of War (not 'Defence' any more) is embedded with rhetoric tropes, such as repetition and the use of metaphor or irony; it is a not very subtle propaganda, but it still infects people's brains, like a virus. This language is even worse when woven into the language of a new Christian crusade against Islam. US military commanders have recently being reported as invoking extremist Christian rhetoric about biblical “end times” to justify the war in Iran to troops. It was stated that one commander had said that it was "all part of God’s divine plan." and he specifically referenced numerous citations out of the Book of Revelation referring to Armageddon and the imminent return of Jesus Christ. Whether this is true or not, (like so much information taken from the Internet it is hard to verify), this is why we should never forget the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in1572 of Huguenots in France or the Albigensian Crusade against the Cathars or the Lisbon massacre of Jews in 1506 or much closer to home, the 17th-century Cromwellian conquest of Ireland, which resulted in a population loss estimated as up to 50%.  All of these bloodbaths were perpetrated in the name of Christ.

On March 16, 1968 the US soldiers that entered the village of My Lai were expecting to face Viet Cong fighters; instead, they found mostly women, children and elderly men. In just four hours, these soldiers systematically murdered between 347 and 504 unarmed villagers; raping women and girls, mutilating their bodies and finally burning the village to the ground in order to obliterate the horrors they had just committed.

Iran is now we are told an "existential and imminent threat.” The United States president has stated that after many Iranian civilians have already died in air strikes; “We may hit it a few more times just for fun.”
It was one of those air strikes that killed over one hundred Iranian school girls, a fact I find hard to digest. I have just returned from visiting my two granddaughters, girls of the same age as those killed in Tehran. If those girls had been in that school, I don't know if I could have carried on, their deaths would have built a fire in my soul that nothing would quench and I would have become a something other than I am now; something nasty in the world. Today in Iran over a hundred grandparents and parents will be grieving and hating and not knowing what to do with themselves, as at the same time the United States Secretary of War, tells reporters that he believes the war should have "no stupid rules of engagement".

I wonder if he had ever been asked to answer Alister Cooke's question; "Is it valiant to bomb a hundred women and children from the air, and despicable to shoot them on the ground?"

The My Lai massacre demonstrated to us what happens when moral principles are abandoned in war. Soldiers become murderers and the state becomes complicit in an unacknowledged approval of their murderous actions. After the 
My Lai atrocity those of us in the Western World that thought we were civilised had to confront the real darkness of the human condition. The massacre still stands as a warning that no nation, however exceptional it believes itself to be, is immune to committing atrocities when poor leadership and moral failure converge. 

In 2003 my wife Sue and myself joined a huge antiwar march in London, held to try to dissuade the UK Government from going to war with Iraq alongside the United States. At that time lies about the existence of weapons of mass destruction were used to drag the then Labour Government into the conflict. It feels as if we live in similar times; Tony Blair again stepping in to advise us that we should jump when the Americans say we should jump. The mind state of the man in unbelievable, he must be made of teflon or worse, especially if he has been infected with right-wing Christian fundamentalism. 

Antiwar demonstration 2003

A card I made at the time to instigate conversation about the value of antiwar protest marches

At times like this I find that drawing can still give me comfort, even though it can't offer any solution. There exists a monumental image that was drawn and printed by Mustafa al Hallaj. It fused folklore and myth with what were then the realities of Palestinian history. His images open out a visual narrative that mourns for those who have suffered after many years of conflict. It visualises the communal trauma of the Palestinian people and asserts that art can be a vessel for collective memory. It was never really finished, as he died in a fire before the idea was completed. This being perhaps the secret power of the work, in it not coming to an end, it reminds us that the suffering of the Palestinian people continues. 

Mustafa al Hallaj: 'Self portrait as man, God and the Devil'




Mustafa al Hallaj: Details taken from 'Self portrait as man, God and the Devil'

Mustafa al Hallaj lost most of his work to bombing when he had a studio in Beirut. His 'Self portrait as man, God and the Devil' is a black and white visual narrative that is over ninety-seven metres long. It is hard to see what is going on from a small on screen image, so perhaps I can give a description of a tiny section to show how his visual logic worked. Imagine a figure bent at right angles from the waist, carrying a graveyard on his back, with an Afro-Eurasian Hoopoe or 'Stink bird', standing over him. In local folktales it was said that this bird carried its dead mother buried in its head. Mustafa al Hallaj explained his visual connection in this way; "Our friends when they die are buried in us...Their bodies go to the graveyard but their personalities stay with us. We Palestinian artists are an orchestra. We are one choir...We have many friends and many dead. We are a walking graveyard of these personalities who left." Like the bird, the man carries the dead, however on his back rather than in his head. The artist also takes the weight of the dead, a weight carried by his images. His images may not have changed anything but they remain a testament to the conditions of the place and time he lived through.

One of the strongest opponents of the Iraq war was the Labour politician Tony Benn, who's son Hilary is a current Leeds Labour MP. His House of Commons speech at the time could just as easily be used today as a warning to all those that think war is a good idea. 

Tony Benn reminds the UK Government about the reality of war

I can feel completely helpless in times like this, my internal feeling state can be of deep depression, anxiety and grief, even though I am removed by thousands of miles from the reality of the conflict in Iran. This blog is supposed to be about drawing and related matters, it is important to therefore flag up the fact that I do take comfort in knowing that artists like Mustafa al Hallaj continued to make work when much closer to the front line than I have ever been and even after losing most of his work to a bombing raid, he still had enough belief in the power of image making to continue working. If we are brought to a stop by the words of the powerful, their words will prevail, this is why remembering the My Lai atrocity still matters. Artists I believe have a moral duty to confront the sometimes dark reality of the human condition and visualise it. But to do this alongside all those other qualities of life, such as being in love, caring for others and being able to appreciate the fragile delicate reality of a Spring morning. 

Goya: The disasters of war

Käthe Kollwitz: Raped

Durer: Turf

Stella Ross-Craig: Bramble: 1955

The drawings of Goya and Käthe Kollwitz often confront the dark reality of the human condition, but still growing out of the hedgerow are clumps of grasses and brambles, the former looked at wondrously by Durer many years ago and the later beautifully if more scientifically observed by Stella Ross-Craig. We have to remind ourselves that the love and care that Durer and Ross-Craig invested in the making of their images, are the very qualities that will save our souls from the horrors that Goya and Käthe Kollwitz witnessed.

Reference:


See also:

Wednesday, 9 July 2025

Drawing war

In an earlier post, Drawing as Testimony, I referred to drawings done by an ex principal of the Art College, Eric Taylor, made when he was a War Artist. The human condition is such that we are always entering a time of war and the role of artists and drawing, is still I think something worth exploring, and in a time when social media seems to dominate communication, drawing might be one of the few ways to slow down how we reflect upon what we do to ourselves. 

Drawing made on experiencing Belsen concentration camp: Feliks Topolski 1945

Mazen Kerbaj's graphic novel, 'Beirut Won't Cry' was published in 2017 and the images Kerbaj made for this book reminded me that graphic artists memorialise events in a very different way to photographers or people who write reports. War is with us always and Kerbaj joins a long tradition of artists, who attempt to process the experience of it and distil its visual texture, in such a way that those of us from outside a war zone, can begin to make some sort of sense of what happens within it.

Mazen Kerbaj sketchbook pages

'Beirut Won't Cry'

I'm always interested in the relationship between the production of art and its dissemination. Because Kerbaj's work is printed in black and white, it can be easily disseminated. As 'Beirut Won't Cry' was put together in a diary format, it was a straightforward task to take two of his books and cut the pages out, so that all the images became 'released' back into the world. Sometimes his work was shown using the original drawings, in which case they would be framed and presented as you would expect for an art exhibition. This more traditional format suits museums, such as in the example immediately below, however when needing to show the work out in the streets, the simple expedient of the images being taken out of his book and then being attached to pegs on a washing line would do. Each presentation format reaching different audiences and eliciting I would presume very different responses. 

The New Museum: New York 

Maxxi Museum: Rome

The street of Madrid

The streets of Barcelona

I went to a 'Situation Leeds' meeting last night at the Hyde Park Book Club, which was focused on how the city could once again become host to a wide range of art practices, which would be presented/performed/shown in situations and places that were outside of the normal gallery environments; which is probably why I was reminded of the times when Kerbaj's work was hung in the streets using washing lines. There was also an opening of the Wrangthorn Enquirer, an exhibition of work designed to reflect upon the Hyde Park area and which would be integrated into the streets by poster and flyer inserts during the time of the exhibition. The meeting and opening neatly coincided, as the work on display was a clear example of what was possible. 


From the Wrangthorn Enquirer exhibition: Hyde Park Book Club: Leeds

Although not about war, the exhibition was a reminder of how news reaches us about war and other 'news worthy' events. Usually the media only focuses on the worst of our lives, and the Wrangthorn Enquirer response, is an attempt to show that what is actually happening is always far more complicated and that humour and just plain oddness are always there if we look for it, and without these things life could feel as if it is too dreadful to face. 

When making art that acts as some sort of witness to a traumatic event, there will always be an issue about 'taking sides'. Arguments will proliferate about which side of a conflict's views are being represented, but at the end of the day, the reality is that the images we see of any situation are the response of one human being to finding themselves there. If they are living in the area that is being bombed, they will see the situation from the viewpoint of those being bombed, being a witness comes with all the problems associated with having to deal with the situation that has been witnessed. 

Kerbaj has a new book out, 'Gaza in My Phone'. This time he has made drawings in response to social media images of Israel’s campaign in Gaza. I work in ink, and like many artists who do, often regard the process a little like developing a sensitive divining rod. Keep drawing and eventually the drawings will just draw themselves. Kerbaj is able to distill, from the images that arrive daily on his mobile phone, some sort of humane understanding of a process that is perhaps beyond understanding. There is an ideological shroud that has been drawn over Gaza, that makes it hard to look at what is going on there with any clarity and it is also a disaster that paradoxically I feel the media is somehow asking us to forget; information overload makes it harder and harder to hold on to any sort of reality. 

Drawing inscribes things, it puts ideas down on paper and as it does it externalises them, and therefore forms a particular type of memory. Photographs somehow don't seem as real, and now that they come alongside A1 software, we become more and more suspicious of what they represent. 'Gaza in My Phone' recognises the new reality that faces all of us, that so much of our life experience now comes modified and focused by our mobile phone screens. Kerbaj, like myself, is getting daily updates on his phone about what is happening and he will, again like myself, be getting some sort of algorithm inflected stream of images to look at, a fact that means that whatever information he is receiving, it will already have been filtered, in one way or another. We always knew that reporting was to some extent biased, whether this was unconscious or conscious, but we used to have an idea that there was somewhere a measure of some sort that could allow us to test out the degree of bias; I'm not sure that exists anymore.  
Algorithms have been running for years now in relation to myself. Every book, every ticket for an exhibition or concert, every plane ticket or accommodation paid for, has been sifted and graded as to how likely I might buy a similar experience again. My posts on all the media platforms will have been analysed and again assessed as to what I am more likely to buy, in relation to my various views on the world. If it is seen that I'm interested in culture, I'm inundated with adverts about travel to Venice or other cultural hot spots. Above all what the algorithms are doing are gradually bringing together an idea of who and what I am. They filter the world in terms of myself, so that eventually all the books, images, experiences, points of view and whatever else is out there, begin to coincide with what I feel the world should look like, simply because some algorithm has decided I wouldn't like something or other. Therefore my computer and my phone, whether I like it or not, are giving me a particular, slanted view on life, which there will be an obvious tendency for me to agree with. 

When Joseph Beuys came to the old Jacob Kramer college whilst he had a drawing exhibition in the Leeds Art Gallery in 1982, he gathered the students together and told them to stop painting and to go out and buy all the different newspapers and read them all. In particular to read the ones that were written from points of view they did not agree with. Guardian readers were made to read the Mail, Sun readers the Mirror and all the other types of magazine literature such as Private Eye and Horse and Hounds, were to be thrown into the pot. We then questioned the students on what they were finding out. What the students realised was that people fed themselves news based on what their interests were. The world was out there for all people to experience, but people preferred to use media to reassure them that their take on it was the right one. Socialists read the Socialist Worker, as it offered them constant reaffirmation as to why the system was so unfair and needed changing, whilst the reading of Horse and Hounds reaffirmed how important your horse's welfare was and that the most significant dates to remember coincided with the best horse trials. We need to be part of the 'tribe' we belong to and the media offers us as many possibilities to fit in as there are 'tribes'. Capitalism then fills each slot up with things to buy that reinforce your idea of yourself. We buy the Sun because we see ourselves as a Sun reader, which is an idea that goes much wider than the newspaper. 
The Sun targets the lower middle social classes, most of whom haven’t attended higher education. Two thirds of its readers are over 35 years old, 54% are male and its biggest audience share comes from the C2DE demographic. N.b. C2DE refers to the three lower social and economic groups in the UK. The Sun is written for a reading age of 8 years old. Using words in bold, lots of visuals and smaller chunks of text means they are purposefully making their product accessible to everyone and especially appealing to members of our society who have weaker literacy skills. (Nb this is not a measure of intelligence, just type of approach to literacy; most of the people I used to work with in the steel works never read books, but they were smart and witty and could think with their hands).The Sun's editorial policy is focused on stories that are often critical of elite groups and political stories are often framed around issues affecting ‘normal’ families and the idea of 'normal' and 'not normal' is often used as a measurement of whether or not something is right or wrong. I.e. is this something we would like to make part of our family or tribe or something we would exclude? This is no different to how many of the other newspapers operate, there is the term "Guardian reader", which is used to imply a stereotype of a person with modern progressive, left-wing or "politically correct" views. I would be put into that class, as the Guardian is one of the very few newspapers I ever buy and read and my views would be seen as left of centre. This doesn't mean I am more or less right about things, it does not mean the Guardian is more or less right about things either, it simply means I feel more comfortable with certain viewpoints, and how they are expressed, especially ones that suggest there could be alternative answers to the world's issues. I have always been a 'what if?' person, "introverted intuition" (IN) personality type, rather than a 'let's do it! "extraverted sensing" (ES) one. Social media relies on these differences and feeds them, so that gradually what just felt a bit more comfortable, becomes a certainty and right. This is how positions are formed and when a group with one way of thinking has power, it can believe that it is right to impose that way of thinking on everybody else. What is always needed are checks and balances, to ensure that no one way of thinking predominates. The reason we as a species have such a range of personality types is probably because the tribe needed them. We need leaders and information gatherers, fighters and nurturers, empaths and artists and at various different times we need to be able to work together. 

Charley's War

When my son was a boy he followed the Charley's War stories that had been first printed in the comic 'Battle Picture Weekly' and which were then continued in 'The Eagle'. 
The strip follows Charley's life in the trenches and his experiences during the first world war and was an extremely graphic portrayal of the horrors of it. The writer Pat Mills added a political slant to the strip, that had not been seen before in British war comics and the artist Joe Colquhoun, drew the black and white images with an appropriate texture that reminded me of the way horror fiction was drawn for American EC comics in the 1950s. There were none of the heroics that I had come across in my own war comics reading when I was a boy.

Charley's War: Pat Mills and Joe Colquhoun

This reflection on war was made 70 years after the event, long enough away from the war to enable its reality to be at last confronted. The War Picture Library comic books I read as a boy, had a totally different take on war. It was of course the second world war that was depicted, the one my father had been conscripted into and the British troops were always wise cracking heroes and the enemy evil. These comics also had adverts in them and they were often concerned with what it was to be a man. 

The War Picture Library

Charles Atlas

Charles Atlas still figures large in my imagination. His "Dynamic Tension" method of body building was a physical training method emphasising the pitting of one muscle group against another to build strength. I remember at one point in the early 1960s my father took up a course and I'm reminded of the concept every time to go to a Pilates session. The comics of my boyhood were mini-training manuals for what it was thought I would need to be like as a man. There were no women in these comics, just camaraderie, the idea of loyalty, of what bravery consisted of and of how you needed to conduct yourself within a troop of other men when at war. 

Drawing by Hugo Pratt

Some of the illustrators for the War Picture Library were very good, Hugo Pratt the great Italian creator of the Corto Maltese comics, cut his teeth on drawing for War Picture Library. For boys like myself they were a constant source of information as to how you could graphically represent the world, just using black and white mark making techniques. When I'm trying to draw any sort of explosion of energy, or invent a patch of land, part of my hand memory will always be based on copies I made in pencil of the images I found in these comics. I wish I had been told at the time that artists drew these with fine brushes and black ink and that they were drawn slightly larger and reduced down in size for reproduction. 

Yet again I find myself weaving together personal history, drawing and how I relate to it, with reflections on what makes the world the sort of place it is. When I initially saw Kerbau's work, I immediately thought of George Grosz. Many of you might be puzzled by that, as their work looks very different, but I'll try and explain.

Grosz: Wartime slaughter watched by bureaucratic overseers

After being in the German army for two years Grotz became so distressed by the experience that in 1917 he unsuccessfully tried to commit suicide. He ended up in a military hospital, under the care of which he recovered, only to find that the authorities had on his recovery decided to execute him, as an example to others that death was no way to escape war. A wealthy patron of his, Count Kessler, finally intervened and the death sentence was commuted, he was from this point a walking dead man. 
Grosz: The everyday reality of war.

Within the grip of warfare death is an everyday reality. In Europe during the First World War the sight of a dead body, washed up on the side of a river near you was the new normal, in Gaza, children now write their names on their arms, so that people will know who they were if they are killed, another new normal. Born in Lebanon in 1975, Kerbaj spent the first 15 years of his life living amongst a war. "It was, 'That is a shoe, that is rain, that is the sound of a bomb,'" he stated. "It seemed natural", it had become normal. 

From: 'Gaza in My Phone'

Mazen Kerbaj now lives in Berlin and responds to what is happening in Gaza by interacting with social media. George Grosz moved to New York from Berlin during the rise of Fascism in the 1930s. Both artists eventually working at some remove from the situations that first impelled them to make work. 

Disturbed While Eating (1947), George Grosz

Grosz was by far the more troubled man. Surviving suicide, only to be told that you are now going to be executed, must mangle your inner psyche and the image above made in the relative safety of the USA after the end of the second world war, really does feel as if it was made by someone who knew what starvation was all about. 

I am also at some remove from any war zone. In the safety of my room here in Leeds I can watch endless hours of war news footage and no matter how much empathy I might feel I have, I can't really understand what is happening. 

I respond, because I have to. As an artist I can't shut my eyes, but how powerful or useful my responses are I'm not sure. Kerbaj is a voice of resistance, Grosz a reminder of the fact that it is always the poor and the ordinary people that suffer most during wartime and that the rich, nearly always escape. Both artists tell me in their different ways that there is something insane and totally illogical about war. 

In my own work, constant media footage of devastated towns has finally found its way into my image banks and I have made a lot of drawings, several of which have been turned into prints.




Drawings


Prints

I was trying to come to terms with the empty shells of buildings and the human lives they represented. For each and every family, be this in Ukraine, Russia, Gaza, Iran or Israel, when your home is destroyed and your family attacked, the trauma is terrible, media arguments as to whether or not one side or the other has right on their side, in no way alleviate the pain and suffering of those on the ground. 

Unknown soldier

Around the edges of war news footage are always soldiers, hanging about, just being there, as if waiting for the film crew to leave, so that they can get on with the reality of war. I sometimes try and draw these men in the brief moments of their appearance, as some sort of way to give them a life, to release them from their electronic media existence. 


Unknown soldiers

As I drew these images I was reminded of my first encounter with drawn images of soldiers in comic books for boys and I began to doubt whether my experience of life, had prepared me to take on image making that could do justice to the situation. My life has never exposed me to the harsh realities of war, but even so, I have made a body of work about it and still occasionally still do make images based on my responses to how the media presents war. It is my own way of attempting some sort of connection with something that the media always seems to disconnect me from. Above all, I have this feeling that the further away from war's reality we think we are, the more the possibility grows of its dark tentacles spreading out and engulfing everything and everybody and that it will one day arrive on our doorsteps totally unannounced. 

See also:


Sunday, 27 February 2022

In praise of verbs

'Actions speak louder than words' is an old proverb and we all sort of know what it means. We are worried about the truth value of words; when something is actually done it is hard to argue against the reality of the action, an action in effect 'speaks the truth' or makes something happen. But there are problems with actions, especially those that are the consequence of words. So please allow me to use words to sort of undermine how we use words, especially at a time when so much verbal rhetoric is aired as to how and why nations end up at war with each other. 

I have been trying to envision a world where our present relationship between nouns and verbs is very different. Of the words in the English language approximately 70% of them are nouns; however in the Potawatomi language, (an Algonquian language from North America) it is a very different story, 70% of their words are verbs and in this difference lies a conundrum that is fundamental to how different cultures approach the world. 

But first of all I need to backtrack and go back to when I was a boy living in Dudley in the Black Country. My mother worked as a cleaner and part-time usherette in the local Gaumont cinema, both jobs earning little money, so she used to also be a Grattan Catalogue representative or 'agent' as they were called. This meant she would take the catalogue round to someone's house and get them to look through the various goods advertised, trying to persuade people to buy new clothes or whatever else they might 'need'. Something my mum used to feel very conflicted about because once the items had been ordered, a hire purchase agreement was set up, looking at paying for the item over 20 weeks, the 'never-never' as my mother called it, and she would then have to go round to people's houses and collect the money each month to send off to Grattan's. My mother intuitively knew people didn't really need these things but they wanted them, and in that small difference money was to be made. 








Grattan catalogues

Every Grattan's catalogue would come with a painting on its cover. I have no idea why, except I suppose it made the catalogue look respectable and classy, especially as it would be left around a wide range of people's houses for browsing into. Buying on the never-never was at the time seen as not a good thing, it was something that implied you had little extra money and that you were living beyond your means. This was where my mother became conflicted, on the one hand she was glad of the orders as they meant more money coming in but on the other hand these buyers were her friends and she worried about the strain on their finances that buying things that they didn't really need was developing. This was also a male / female divide. Women were often not in control of finances and therefore buying on the never-never from a catalogue gave them an opportunity to make decisions about buying things for themselves that they could just about afford, especially of they made the household budget stretch that little further. I was fascinated by these catalogues. Not only did they seem to operate as social fulcrums around which a lot of conversations would develop, they were the only way I got to see any images of art. No other images of paintings would enter our house until I decided to get books in from the local library and that would not be until I had decided to study art as an 'O' level subject. I would stare at the cover images of mainly Impressionist and Post-Impressionist paintings for ages, mesmerised by their otherness, they were so different to anything else I encountered. I could tell they were constructed, made as paintings and as such even at a remove from the originals of several intervening technologies, such as photography, post-production and printing, was able to see that they were worlds in themselves, things that carried a special 'aura' as Walter Benjamin put it. As to the images inside the catalogues, where things were labeled and numbered, this was about 'things', each thing displayed in its own frame or space, each object presented photographically so that it felt that what you saw was what you would get, sort of narratives of acquisition. On these pages, things of desire were presented as very seductive images, priced, numbered and photographed in full colour, they had their own commodity 'aura'. As I look back I find it fascinating that my introduction to painting came via these catalogues, my lifetime involvement with the 'fetish' of art originating in catalogues designed to get people to buy things. 


Everything in the boy's toy section of the catalogue was presented as a possible addition to my world, however there was nothing grounding any of these items in reality, just a word and a number. Brand names were in particular prominent, Matchbox, Corgi, Dinky, Airfix, all names from the past now, but one's that at the time seemed to promise a boy like me some sort of paradise or escape from the drab reality of 1950s and 60s life in Dudley. 
The catalogue by its very name was an extension of a powerful idea, one that was concerned with listing and defining things, presenting the world in a systematic order. You were shown things you could own or possess, a list of objects, nouns, things that were in many ways fantasies, ideas that would for yourself or others give great pleasure if you could possess them. The women in the fashion pages all looked beautiful, the men handsome and the boys and girls were always happy. You were also presented with an exchange system, money for things, and instead of these things being listed as to their direct use value, you were being invited to a future paradise, one where you would magically be handsome, beautiful and happy, so long as you had the thing you saw floating enticingly on the catalogue page, a thing you could exchange for money; but not real money, never-never money. You were never told how the having of any particular item would change things, it was though implied that once you had it, once you possessed the object, (the noun) things would be different. 

Years later I would come to recognise this situation as being what Karl Marx called, 'commodity fetishism', a term he appropriated from a 1760s text, 'The Cult of Fetish Gods' by Charles de Brosses, an idea that helped him make sense of what he perceived as a magical quality within commodity exchange.  In 'Capital' he wrote, "A commodity appears at first sight an extremely obvious, trivial thing. But its analysis brings out that it is a very strange thing, abounding in metaphysical subtleties and theological niceties". Marx had taken a term from where it was being used to refer to a belief that spiritual power or life energy can be found in inanimate things, specifically a belief in totems. He saw that a belief in invisible lifelike powers existing within inanimate objects was essential to a meaning system that embeds the believer into the wider inanimate world he or she exists within. Marx borrows this concept to make sense of what he terms 'commodity fetishism', the commodity he says remains simple as long as it is tied to a clear use-value. I.e. to assuage hunger, to keep someone warm, to protect you from harm etc. However Marx wasn't so clear about 'use-value' in terms of its more psychological meaning, for instance if something gave you added status, appealed to your vanity, made you feel better in some way or was simply something you didn't have but could now own. Things were Marx believed 'magical', in that if they were not for direct use, they promised 'magical' effects, that were he would argue 'fictional' or of no clear use value, but which nevertheless appeared to be the drivers for possible life changing transformations. Once the system was set in motion and people had enough or believed they had enough disposable money to buy things, the process of commodity fetishism became self fulfilling. People began to believe that you earned money to be able to buy things and that it was things that gave you your worth. Instead of valuing a human life in terms of what someone did, (actions), you valued human lives on what they owned, (things) and the amount of money you had to buy them. The central moment of value exchange was that of labour for money, not a clear use value such as picking fruit in order to be able to eat it, but something far more mysterious, such as working on an assembly line testing springs, in return for an agreed wage. An agreement though that took place without the worker having any idea of the real value of their labour, it being an activity now seemingly divorced from any deep or clear understanding of how this labour fitted into the production system as a whole. 

Sorry for the diversion but I needed to establish some sort of personal background against which I could set out how the cataloguing of things, the dissecting into parts of complex interconnected events and the breaking or atomising of these into things, changes how we think. The more a language uses nouns, the more it can be used to catalogue the world as a series of things, its internal structure eventually changing the way we perceive the external world. Eventually what was about doing and engaging becoming about possibilities of ownership. If now we go back to how verbs and nouns are used, I can compare my situation with a boy or girl growing up as part of an indigenous north American Potawatomi community. They would have had a very different set of experiences but ones that are related to how all people and the world are intertwined and I believe linked to structures so deep rooted that they are the reasons why commodity fetishism has taken such a strong hold on our Western society. A hold that can only be explained I feel, because we are hard wired to understand the world in terms of an active inner life force, something that runs through everything; people, animals, trees, flowers, rocks and streams, but that we now only really appreciate this in our unconscious minds; logic and rationality having exterminated something that was vital to our grasp of life. 
In 'The Democracy of Species' Robin Wall Kimmerer points out that in Potawatomi the syntax of language is aligned to a very different world view, one where there is a need 'to provide different ways to speak to the living world and the lifeless one.' (2021, p.12.) Robin Wall Kimmerer uses the example of our word 'bay' a noun meaning 'a broad inlet of the sea where the land curves inwards', as a focus around which to explain a very different idea of relationships with other things. In Potawatomi the word for 'bay' is a verb. When the idea of a bay is a noun it is as 'defined by humans', (Ibid, p. 15) it becomes something that can be owned or taken as property. The verb, 'wiikwegamaa', to be a bay, lets it live, it defines itself. The water within it is finding a particular form, it has decided not to be in a stream form or in its full ocean form, these other forms require other verbs, because these things are alive. The Potawatomi language is a reflection of animacy, or 'the life that pulses through all things'.  (Ibid, p. 15). This is a language that allows its users to converse with the world on an equal level. As Robin Wall Kimmerer also points out you would not call your grandmother an 'it'. Imagine saying about your gran, "It is getting old." In most North American Indian indigenous languages there are no grammatical gender systems, only differences in animation. For instance hills, mountains, stones, the wind, stories, the sea, fire, trees, places etc. are all animate, so instead of pointing to an apple and asking "What is that?", you would say, "Who is that being?". In English however we are either humans or things, our language divides us from everything else. If we were all people, we would feel very differently about the other people we meet. Say hello to the mountain, acknowledge the rain and speak with the grass. There are no others, we are all one.

Somehow the life that pulses through all things became broken down, catalogued and the subjective experience of this turned into objects in the objective West. However somewhere inside the idea of commodity fetishism is a remaining ghost of a previous relationship we used to have with the world, perhaps this is the real spectre that haunts Europe. The spiritual power or life energy that can be found in all inanimate things still somehow survives, but Marx in recognising it, focused too much on how commodity exchange relies on our collective ability to use that invisible power to build some sort of personal capital and not enough on how we used to recognise energy exchange in a day to day reciprocity with the world that surrounded us. The moment of exchange for Marx became more about an awareness of who was taking what from the exchange, rather than an awareness of the need for reciprocity. In the wider Potawatomi sense of reciprocity, people understood their obligations to the land, to the plants that fed them and the animals they shared the world with.
The only things in the Potawatomi language that are not seen as animate are those seen as extensions of human people, things made by human beings such as a table. They would say, "Table it is". The table is an extension of us, a tool and as such we don't need to negotiate with it and ask its permission for being able to conjoin in its being, it has the respect of being crafted by a human and that is enough. But what about that toy I wanted so much as a boy? On the one hand I never saw it made, I could not give it the respect of coming from another individual human being's effort, even though I am aware that that effort must be in there somewhere. It in effect arrives from 'nowhere', I encounter it as I would a rock or stone, out on the hills, so I ought to treat it as such, as an animate thing of the world, and ask it, "Who is this being?", what relationship do I have with it? We just get things backwards, instead of asking it "what are you offering me?", I should be enquiring, "What sort of relationship could we have?", what interconnectedness is being revealed? Respect is important here, there are human rights, but also animal rights, vegetable rights and in this case mineral rights. The right 'to be' is too often negated within the very languages people speak and by using more event based material languages such as drawing, we perhaps begin to sense the respect we need to offer all doings and not just those that happen to look like or seem to effect just us; and as we do this, to begin to see the nature of the world as a series of events and not lists of things. 

So what has all this to do with drawing? Well as I have pointed out before, drawing helps us think and solve problems in ways that words don't always have answers to. By taking one project, The Anti-Extinction Library, perhaps it is easier to explain. I've used the term 'disegno' several times before to cover the idea that artists need to draw to think through their projects. 




Drawings made in order to think through the forms that consist of the Anti-Extinction Library

The Anti-Extinction Library is an installation that permanently shelters the embryonic cells and DNA of rare lifeforms, created by artists Mitchell Joachim, Chris Woebken and Oliver Medvedik, the work raises the issue of species biodiversity vanishing at an alarming rate because of climate change and habitat loss. The artists have created a space that safeguards organisms at their earliest and most fundamental state. and it allows anyone to submit suggestions of local species to save. It is a library that has reciprocity as a core principle. The artists state; “Besides being cryogenically preserved, each strand of DNA has an embedded genetic maker that contains the entire “Nature Bill of Rights” modified from the UN documents on human rights. These encoded markers support a narrative that all species are equal and all are necessary to a healthy planet.” 

The Anti-Extinction Library

The layers 

The library project is complicated and built to last, its external egg type shape designed as a visual metaphor for the nurturing of organic materials. The three artists associated with the concept bring with them a range of skills from an understanding of biodiversity to construction and computer 3D visualisation knowledge. This cooperative effort is typical of contemporary art practices that seek to bring various knowledge forms together, so that change can be effected by deeper collaborative research and the final project is an event rather than something directed at the construction of an art object. 

However a project of this complexity can appear daunting, and a far more direct engagement with the world is to look at it, and to commune with it by drawing it. 

Sketchbook drawings

A drawing forces you to actually look at something and in doing so you give it your full attention. The bond that this activity constructs between yourself and what is being drawn is a doing thing, an event and as such it is a way to get past nouns and begin the slow journey back to being able to be with the world. One way to begin the process of using more verbs is to go out and walk and look and draw, in this way you begin to act on experiences rather than talk about them. 

This week is however another terrible one in relation to how we as a species operate. We have one individual with vast power deciding that a body of land belongs to Russia as opposed to the people that live there. Just as the north American indigenous peoples were removed from their lands by Western Europeans, the people of the Ukraine now find themselves subject to the whims of a stronger military power. I don't think it's about who is right or wrong in these conflicts, you can find arguments on either side,The long term reality is always awful, atrocities often hushed up at the time, the victor always writing the initial accounts of how the war was won. Only much later is the reality revealed, often at a time long enough removed from actions that they are now 'historic', or something to 'get over' and to be put behind us, until of course we are again faced with a similar situation. That's the problem with things; the Ukraine isn't a thing, it isn't something to take, to steal or to control, it is part of a doing, a harvesting of wheat, a breathing of peoples, an ecology of interconnectedness, that if seen as a simple thing, is diminished and in that diminishment care disappears, replaced by ideas of possession, of control and the exercise if power. 

See also: