Sunday, 22 January 2023

Celia Paul, Gwen John and Curtis Holder

 

I recently wrote a post about a small Celia Paul etching I came across in the Marlborough Gallery. I have since been looking at her drawings and amongst several very different images found the self portrait drawing above. I really find it fascinating, as it has echoes of some of the things I have been trying to do myself. The head feels as if it could be made out of mixing and flowing gases, different textural energies merge into each other, so that the head appears to drift into visibility. At the same time it is still a head, the eyes seem shut and a moment of stability occurs around the ear. As the head twists away from me, I decide something in my own mind about the internal gaze of this shut eyed figure; thinking that what it is doing is in some way asserting its own internal gaze over my own. It is powerful without having to be constructed with all the usual signs of power. Instead of making a drawing of a head as solid as a rock, by drawing it from a low viewpoint, carving it out with tonal masses or by using cross contour lines, this portrait arrives by using fumage like techniques. I have been asking myself, how do you draw energy? How do you draw a body and at the same time reflect on it as a particular set of events that emerge out of and back into the energy flow? This drawing seems to pulse with psychic energy and has a presence, so becomes for myself, a pointer, an indication of a possible direction to take.

The issue of 'presence' and what that actually is, is another of those conundrums that has been on my mind recently. What type of presence can you give to someone or something that is depicted within an image? How does it relate to the actual presence of the person or thing portrayed? Celia Paul is unfortunately sometimes known more for her relationship with Lucien Freud than for her own work, Gwen John was initially known more as a model or 'muse' in relation to the much more famous Rodin. Gradually over the years Gwen John has been seen less and less as a lover of Rodin and more and more as an important artist in her own right. This reflects a shift in society and what was at one point seen as a series of attributes of the 'feminine' and therefore not important, is now read in a very different way. The 'quiet' portraits of Gwen John, express dignity, the importance of an inner voice and calm control. The curve that the composition below is based on, is rather like a strung bow, it is taut and full of controlled energy. The 'presence' of the sitter is undoubted, but it is not the type of presence you associate with the grand portrait tradition of important people. This painting acknowledges and presents the presence of a mortal soul, one that still manages to project a distinct aura, despite a lack of bravura paint energy. In fact the energy pulse comes from the restricted palette, the greys that surround the face and hands, allowing the subtle warms of perceived skin tones, to glow with life.  

Gwen John: Chloë Boughton-Leigh: Leeds City Art Gallery

When you look at Gwen John's drawings you also see this observation of quietness. The fragility of life is glimpsed in her portraits of other women and girls, but it is not a weak fragility, it is one maintained via a steely resolve that sits beneath a quiet exterior. 

Gwen John: Study of a girl

Gwen John: Study of a child

Celia Paul has a similar tough fragility. I like the way that she stares back at you from these drawings. She knows the value of her own presence, she doesn't need to glorify her existence, it simply is. 

Celia Paul: Self portrait: 2007

Celia Paul: Self portrait: Watercolour and coloured pencils

Celia Paul's self portrait, made with watercolour and coloured pencils above, not only 'just exists' or floats into being, it seems to balefully stare out as if acknowledging her own uneasiness about being an artist. This soft almost not there presence, after a while becomes rather uncomfortable to look at; she seems to ask, "What are you looking at?" Her presence defiantly present in what is such an initially insubstantial seeming image. 

Curtis Holder was the 2020 winner of the Sky Arts Portrait Artist of the Year competition. A televised competition that I have previously criticised for being about television and not painting or drawing. Even so I think it is worth looking at some of Holder's drawings, as I believe he is an artist that has managed to come through because of real merit, his work holding up on the TV screen as well as in the flesh. In the context I'm writing about today, it is in the way he draws what I am beginning to think of as energy fields, or how to draw light as both particle and wave, that interests me. He is also drawn to Gwen John as an artist and has made a portrait of her.

Curtis Holder: Gwen John: 2021

Holder's portrait of Gwen John is one of those images that emerges from a flickering 'rain' of lines. He must have worked from a flat image, as Gwen John is long dead, but he raises her back into being by discovering her image in these lines as they cut through the surface of his paper. I am slightly worried about the dark line that curves around an edge of hair, it feels as if it is a leftover from an earlier approach, (one you can also see outlining the shoulders) but besides that I think the drawing is an excellent approach to making a homage of an artist that has obviously had an influence on him. 


The best of Holder's drawings have a quality that allows you to hold mass and energy as two things in your mind at once, in particular I thought the way that the orange of the what I think is a self-portrait below, drifted out into the space around the figure, was an interesting device, as it added an alternative way of dealing with time. The pale residue of orange powder, (I presume it is from faint dustings of pastel, but as I haven't seen the actual drawing it could be traces of a watercolour wash) sits next to the heightened intensity of his orange pullover, in a similar way to an afterimage. Not as an optical opposite, but as a suggestion of an orange moving through space, of a former existence. 

Curtis Holder

The soft orange in the image above I also began to read as a sort of ghost, and it reminded me of another small drawing of Celia Paul's, 'Mandy with wings'. 

Celia Paul: Mandy with wings 2007

Her drawing 'Mandy with Wings' is a beautiful small reminder of how to find magic in the everyday. I suspect the wings that Mandy now has in this image were initially Mandy's shadow cast onto a wall behind her, but Paul has seen another possibility and in the tilt of the head and suggestion of a monk's habit made by a couple of lines traced over Mandy's shoulder, a delicate spiritual idea has floated into being.  

Celia Paul: Mother with clasped hands 2007

In Paul's drawing of her mother with clasped hands above, the 'punctum' for myself is the dark line that stretches from her mother's neck down to her hands. It's like a scar that cuts the figure in two. The vertical lines of the laid paper reinforce the thinness of the image and the hand clenching the other hand's fingers, suggests a nervous awareness of a situation that the eyes can barely look at. I found another drawing of Paul's mother on a scrap of torn paper, its informality suggesting that she didn't want to make too much of the situation, a note made in a moment, perhaps in such a way that she didn't disturb her mother. Perhaps I'm reading my own narrative into the drawing, as I well remember how other people used to react if I decided to draw them, it always seemed such an intrusion, so I tended to make drawings of people surreptitiously. 

Celia Paul: Mother

Celia Paul also draws using watercolour and etching. Again I found her approach fascinating. Whoever Mandy is, Celia Paul seems to be able to find the spiritual in her. In this instance, 'Mandy in Sunlight' she gives her friend a yellow halo, and the 'sunlit head' below, which I presume is also an image of Mandy, suggests even deeper spiritual awareness, closed eyes in both cases intimating the presence of someone who is deeply concerned with her inner world. 

Celia Paul: Mandy in sunlight

Celia Paul: Sun lit head

In the small etching below it is Paul that stares out at us again, her face off centre, unable to 'face' filling the frame, somehow avoiding direct face to face contact, yet at the same time able to stare you out. One eye slightly lower than the other, the image emerging like others out of a haze of marks, this time the ones that an etching plate allows you to make, especially when it is wiped by hand. 

Celia Paul: Self-portrait Etching

See also: 

Friday, 13 January 2023

Fuseli and the Modern Woman

An intriguing exhibition has just finished at the Courtauld's Denise Coates Exhibition Galleries. It focused on the period around the 1790s when the artist Fuseli was making private drawings of what were thought of at the time as 'modern women'. What is fascinating about the drawings is the fusion between reality and fantasy. The observed realities of what was then contemporary fashion, especially hair styles, are suffused with his elaborated fantasies and as he draws they become fetishes. These women are powerful and the drawings suggest that Fuseli had anxieties about gender, identity and sexuality at a time of acute social instability.  This was also the time of the French Revolution, a period where so many ideas that had been unquestioned for many years were being thrown up into the air and effectively ripped apart by what was going on in France. The exhibition, 'Fuseli and the Modern Woman: Fashion, Fantasy, Fetishism', presented a series of drawings I'd never seen before and it helped me to think about a range of issues in relation to image making, in particular the depiction of repressed sexual desire, how to harness difficult psychological energy and how to represent the mythic subconscious in everyday situations. 
Here are a few of the drawings that were shown



I found myself thinking about these head adornments as being similar to those developed by dinosaurs. It has been argued that some dinosaur head extensions, such as those belonging to the parasaurolophus below, were used as sexual attractors. These 18th century drawings feel as if they too represent extinct creatures; unearthed 'creepy' humanoids from an old 'B' movie.

Parasaurolophus



Stegoceras 

The woman sitting reading above is like a member of the Stegoceras family, human invention echoing nature, which is no real surprise as we are as natural as the dinosaurs. 


Triceratops 

Like the triceratops these head growths suggest aggressive defence mechanisms, these are not passive adornments, they are carried with pride. Fuseli's idea of women is a strange one, they exist for him as creatures from another world, some operating as witches or enchantresses; evil beings from midnight fantasies. Apparently his affections were rejected by his first true love, perhaps these drawings are his revenge.


Fuseli: The witch and the mandrake

The mandrake

Because it is a hallucinogenic the mandrake was thought to have magical power and that it was often found in a witch's herbal collection, whereby it was used to heighten and elicit supernatural sexual perversions. It was well known that Joan of Arc at her trial was accused of carrying a mandrake root and this was seen as clear evidence of her witchcraft. Fuseli seems to be both excited and repulsed by these associations. 

Henry Fuseli: The Night-Hag Visiting Lapland Witches 1796

In the painting above, Fuseli is illustrating Milton's text 'Paradise Lost where Milton compares the Hellhounds surrounding Sin to those who "follow the night-hag when, called, / In secret, riding through the air she comes, Lured with the smell of infant blood, to dance / With Lapland witches, while the labouring moon Eclipses at their charms." These nightmare visions were what Fuseli was famous for, his painting 'Nightmare' in particular brought him much fame and he painted several versions of it. 
Fuseli: Nightmare

You could argue that Fuseli was providing the equivalent of the Hammer Horror experience of his day. 

Publicity still: Kiss of the Vampire




Men's wigs: 18th Century

It is important to remember that men as well as women in the 18th century wore very elaborate wigs

Two high hairstyles, the right à la candor or the charm of innocence, 1778


Detail

At times Fuseli's fantasies seem to become even more overt, this particular head covering could be female genitalia. A subject dealt with much more openly by Anna Kiosse in her illustrations. 

Anna Kiosse: Women's genitalia 

Freud would have had a field day with these images. The head and the penis being something that he wrote about as being subconsciously linked. Marcus Grantham, a Freudian psychologist used Freud's ideas to develop his very questionable paper, 'The Sexual Symbolism of Hats' and when you look at wigs you can see that they could easily become part of this collective subgroup of erotic garments. Freud, in the 'Interpretation of Dreams' when writing about the sexual symbolism of hats in dreams stated, 'A woman's hat can very often be interpreted with certainty as a genital organ, and, moreover, as a man's.' So now we have a more complicated reading to consider. These complex constructions like a flowerhead, having both male and female elements. 


Diagram of a flowerhead with male (anthers and pollen) and female (ovary and ovules) aspects






The giant hairpin that is pushed through the top of this hair construction, operates as a sharp reminder of the nature of body piercing. The role of the helmet that Marcus Grantham develops in his Sexual Symbolism of Hats, now being very easy to understand. 


Piercing used to heighten religious ecstasy 

St. Sebastian: Giovanni Antonio Bazzi

Every pierced male member is in symbolic affect a martyrdom. The subconscious desires that are often associated with Saint Sebastian, revealing a psychological sexual ambiguity that lies at the heart of this narrative. 
Freudian psychology is though rather unfashionable at the moment, as Freud is regarded as yet another white, male, middle class privileged European, who analysed the world in terms of his own viewpoint. Witness Paul B. Preciado's address to the École de la Cause Freudienne’s annual conference in Paris. Preciado pointed out the discipline’s complicity with the ideologies of sex, gender and sexual difference dating back to the colonial era and of course as the speech was delivered Preciado was heckled and booed and was unable to finish what was later published as 'Can the Monster Speak?'. All of which is a rich mix of imagery and as this is art, there is no need to decide what it all means. We can though explore how all of these likenesses or connections can become the soil out of which we can grow metaphors. One of the areas we will be looking at as part of the next module will be the central role of visual metaphors in the establishment of meaning. Metaphor is not concerned with what is a right or true reading, it opens out images into alternative territories and as it does so helps us to cope with the ambiguity of life and reconciles differences. In this case looking beyond Fuseli's misogynistic views and trying to understand and find a use for his images within a more inclusive understanding of what might have been going on in his head. 
Every age has its own readings of what went on before and these drawings have become what are sometimes called, 'free floating signifiers', i.e. we can make of them what we wish. This of course gives us the freedom to visit other forgotten images of past times and opens a door to a way of making new work by revisiting old work. 

References

Beyer, J., Fend, M., Gottardo, K. (2022) Fuseli and the Modern Woman: Fashion, Fantasy, Fetishism London: Courtauld

Freud, S. (2010) The Interpretation of Dreams London: Basic Books

Grantham, M. (1949). The Sexual Symbolism of Hats. American Imago6(4), 281-295.

Knell, R. J., & Sampson, S. D. (2011). Bizarre structures in dinosaurs: species recognition or sexual selection? A response to Padian and Horner. Journal of Zoology283, 18-22.

Preciado, P (2021) Can the Monster Speak? Report to an Academy of Psychoanalysts Barcelona: Fitzcarraldo Editions

See also: 

Saturday, 7 January 2023

Feldman’s Model of Art Criticism


Edmund Burke Feldman developed a model of art criticism that is still used by many people as a way to begin an understanding of individual art works. In fact as students you may recognise several of Feldman's stages of criticism in the advise given to you when you are asked to think and make notes about your relationship with other art. These are 
Feldman's basic steps:

Description: You are asked to make a list of the visual qualities of the work that are obvious and immediately perceived. Once you have exhausted the question; “What do you see in the artwork”? then you are to finally ask, “What else”? This "what else?" question is to ensure that you have included both the subject matter, especially in representational works, and the more abstract elements in nonrepresentational work.

Analysis: The focus is on the formal aspects of the work such as composition, tonal range, colour, texture, materials used etc. Questions asked are similar to, “Where is the focus or centre of interest?” "How do the formal elements, line, tone, colour, composition etc. direct or support this centre of interest?”

Interpretation: You are asked to propose ideas for possible meanings based on the evidence. You are allowed to bring your subjective feelings into this, and can project your emotions/feelings/intentions onto the work. The questions are often, “What do I think it means”? “What was the artist trying to communicate to me?", “What elements in the work support my ideas as to how the work is communicating to me?" and what does it make me feel?"

Judgment: Discuss the overall strengths/success of the work. "How powerfully has the work affected my feelings/understanding about something?" "Is it better or worse in communicating something to me than another work of art?"

Feldman's 'Becoming Human Through Art', presented this method for the criticism and evaluation of works of art and it became standard right across the western world of art education for many years. However like many things it comes with a lot of unacknowledged baggage and in 
Feldman's desire to be more rational and balanced perhaps more important things are missed, such as his acceptance of formalism as being central to a critical language. 

A quick search of methods of art criticism or art appreciation will give you a list similar to this: aesthetic, pragmatic, expressive, formalist, relativist, processional, imitation, ritual, cognition, mimetic, postmodern and communication theories. Feldman's theory is partly formal, (description and analysis) and partly expression (interpretation) and partly pragmatic and communication theory. However the theory that I'm personally most drawn to and the one that is the harshest critique of Feldman’s Model is the ritual theory of art.

In 'Art as Experience' John Dewey reminds us that there was a time when the arts were "part of a significant life of an organised community." and "the collective life that was manifested in war, worship, the forum, knew no division between what was characteristic of these places and operations, and the arts that brought colour, grace, and dignity, into them." Art (in this case the combined broad field of visual (painting, decorating, drawing etc.), aural (singing, rhythmic music making, chanting etc.) and anything else that helped communal integration into the life field, such as ingestion of certain foods or drugs, ways of clothing and moving the body, (costume, dance or breathing techniques) was part of "the rites and ceremonies in which the meaning of group life was consummated."

Dewey's definition of art as ritual, when applied to the current role of art in our society, is problematic, but if it was to be returned to, it does point to the need for a transformation of our approach to the arts, if they are to retain the sort of relevance or centrality that they used to possess. Dewey states that the "dislocations and divisions of modern life and thought" hinder art from achieving its true value. His writing is in effect a critique of modernity, and it suggests that if we were to begin evaluating whether an artwork was good or bad, we would have to think about how it celebrated the qualities found in common experience and how it helped us to come to terms with life as it is lived. As such it moves the attention away from individual works of art and begins to look at the events that surround the work or that are intimately associated with it. It also sets the scene for how those that encounter the art enter the ritual. For instance as I go up the steps of the National Gallery and enter its column framed portals, I feel as if I am leaving 'normal' life behind and am entering some sort of special place, whereby my engagement with the things I find in there will be made as part of a ritual.
The feminist aesthetician Heide Gottner-Abendroth, developed what have been called 'matriarchal aesthetics' and in doing so also called for a return, in some way, to premodern times, which she saw to be matriarchal and fundamentally ritualistic. Her "Nine Principles of Matriarchal Aesthetics" is a reflection on ways in which prehistoric art and mythology become a model for contemporary feminist art practice. She also looks at the aesthetics of what were previously considered not aesthetic, an issue I well remember Jill Morgan leading on when she came to Leeds. Back in the 1980s Jill had already turned Rochdale art gallery into a space known for its championing of working class, feminist and black artists and when she came to Leeds she brought with her fresh ways of appreciating other practices in such a way that the borders of what were then considered art, were rethought. I well remember a jam making project, whereby the jars of jam were exhibited as art and she asked the question, why is a painting seen as more important than a jar of home made jam?

Going back to Feldman's model of art criticism, how in the above context, would it have been applied to a jar of jam? On the one hand there are few formal visual qualities beyond colour and texture of jam, type of labelling etc. that can sit alongside the traditional formal qualities we associate with art, (composition, handling, colour, material properties and tonal range etc.) and as analysis is focused on these formal qualities, perhaps a critique would fail or be very slight. If art is made without the background reinforcement of a pervasive community belief that it provides meaning, audiences may well feel disappointed by such art. As Dewey points out, if art is isolated and decontextualised as well as cut off from any sense of community, then the results or benefits of its experience will be diminished. Heide Gottner-Abendroth would argue that art needs to reclaim its ritual roots, which might mean changing our relationship to art, and in order to do so we need to drop Kant's idea of aesthetics being centred on a 'disinterested contemplation'.* The fact that the jam is actually tasty might mean that it helps bring a community together and in doing so the yearly ritual of jam making fulfils a purpose, one that 
Heide Gottner-Abendroth would argue is far more important than the aesthetics of the judgement of beauty that Modernist art practices have concerned themselves with. 

As you return to the university it will soon be assessment time and critiques will once again become important, but remember it is always important to ask questions and one of them may well be, "How are we critiquing the critique?" 

References

Feldmann, E. B. (1970) Becoming Human Through Art, Aesthetic Experience in the School London: Prentice Hall

Ross, S. D. ed (1987) Art and its Significance New York: State University of New York Press. 
("Nine Principles of Matriarchal Aesthetics" is found in Ross's collection)

Rowles, S. (2013) Art Crits: 20 Questions - A Pocket Guide: Featuring Interviews with UK Fine Art Staff on the Topic of the Art Crit London: Q-Art London  (I was interviewed as part of the research for this book, so you will find my thoughts on how we were conducting critiques at the time recorded here)

Kant, I. (1987) The Critique of Judgment London: Hackett

* Kant's Critique of Judgment begins with an account of beauty. The initial issue is: what kind of judgment is it that results in our saying, for example, ‘That is a beautiful sunset’. Kant argues that such aesthetic judgments (or ‘judgments of taste’) should be disinterested, meaning that we take pleasure in something because we judge it beautiful, rather than judging it beautiful because we find it pleasurable.

See also:



The mark of ritual

Aesthetics Today An interesting blog by Professor Tom Leddy, that comments on all things to do with aesthetics. 

Sunday, 1 January 2023

Why art education still matters

I have been working as an art educator for nearly 50 years. Today begins another year, and alongside making resolutions and hoping for new experiences, it is perhaps time to reflect again on what I'm doing. It is very easy to become stuck in one's ways and to allow experience to become a stick with which to beat people with, as opposed to it being something that can be drawn upon as an aid for others or as a help for them to make their own decisions when they need to find the best pathway to take. Recently Art21 asked art educators to reflect on what they thought they were doing and I was in particular interested in what Amiko Matsuo had to say about the art educator as connector. Matsuo had this to say when writing about her own approach to drawing to our attention the tapestry work of Otobung Nkanga.

 Otobong Nkanga, Double Plot, 2018. Photo by Amiko Matsuo

'I walk to the larger textile: a map or network layered and woven in the cosmos. The edge of the textile welcomes a figure about to step forward without feet or a brain. It enters the plane on the wall next to urchiny tree branches. Is the figure tethered to circular captions? Is it directing the mechanical arms to pull at the bubble captions? Floating, it feels unmoored even as it appears to be hard at work'. 

Matsuo points out how she attempts to translate for her students the sense of connectivity and geopolitics that she finds represented in Nkanga's work. She hears her own voice as an arts educator participating in the witnessing and telling of such stories and states that her understanding arrives via a lens of who she is right now and that the collective work of the art educator brings together an awareness of art, artists, other art educators and students, something that as a process she feels both defines her and expands far beyond her.

The fact that Amiko Matsuo begins by stating that it is her own voice that is central to the  witnessing and telling of stories and that she understands artwork through 'a lens of who I am' was I thought spot on. I also thought that it was important to remind everyone that she is also interconnected with a rhizomatic network of artists and other teachers and that her role is to try and connect others that she encounters with that network. She teaches ceramics and has had to think hard about how her own experience can be used to open out new possibilities for an area of creativity that has often been far too constricted in its use as a fine art material, by being seen as 'pottery' or looked at through a very Western lens as 'craft'. Above all she asks open ended questions, suggesting that her students have as much ownership of answers to these questions as she does. She reminds me that as a white, male, Anglo-Saxon I have to be very careful to continue opening myself up to wider and wider forms of thinking in relation to art practices. This is hopefully something I try to constantly work on, being very aware that my background is one of white, male privilege, but at the same time, I still feel able to make work about what it is to be who I have been and reflect on my time as an artist who has emerged from a working class Black Country, English town and who has attempted to always come to terms with life through the practice of making art. We are who we are, but that doesn't mean that we should be complacent, we need to keep on striving to be more aware, to watch what is going on and to uncover the many histories that lie behind the things we experience. As well as trying to remain self aware and trying to keep myself open to changing sociological patterns in both art and society, I have also had to think about why I might still be of value to a community of practitioners. Olivia Laing, in her book 'Funny Weather: Art in an Emergency', looks to find a stance for her writing that as she puts it, avoids 'paranoid reading'. I.e. the world is so full of horrid and worrying things that it is too easy to spend most of our time unpicking the wounds of modern life. I agree with her and would like to think that an aspect of my role as an art educator and as an artist is to look for things that are positive possibilities, that are speculative futures that suggest life affirming directions of travel, rather than using my activities to erect static platforms from which to rage and shout about the tragic consequences of our present day political realities. As Laing puts it, to be 'more invested in finding nourishment than identifying poison'. (Laing, 2021, p.4) 

The readers of this blog as well as current and past students will of course be the judges of whether or not I manage to provide a fertile soil with which to nourish practice or whether I have just missed the point and that art practice is now somewhere totally different and that it is time for me to retire. I still though have a belief in a practice that has at times been compared to a religion. It has been argued that the foundational principle for the interconnection between art and religion is the reciprocity between image making and meaning, a connection similar to a creative correspondence between the human and the spiritual. The actual process of making something that operates as an external mind, that is at its core a fetish, something that is inanimate but which is possessed by an idea, is something wonderful. Artists supply the world with things to think with, special tools that are magical in that we embed within these things triggers for possibilities, we provide the grit around which, pearl like, ideas may form in other minds. 

The art educator also needs to help provide a safe but also transformational space for students to operate within. This has become harder to do since covid. I am aware that some students no longer see the studio as a safe space. In communal spaces other people become threats, their bodies potentially hosting invisible microbes and for those that see life in this way, daily existence becomes a constant battle against unseen menaces. Maslow's 'Hierarchy of Needs' is something all would be educators are introduced to in the early stages of any educational qualification; you are taught that every person has unique capabilities and has the possibility to move towards a level of self-actualisation. Unfortunately, educational progress is often disrupted by a failure to meet basic needs. Life experiences often causing an individual to become stuck and recently life seems to have thrown up a complicated mess of experiences, designed to unsettle and undermine the confidence of many would be learners. Therefore as an educator, I have to believe that I can help provide a safe space for thinking, one that can offer sustenance in times of unease, as well as provide information upon which someone can build their own educational pathway. One aspect of this is, as Amiko Matsuo puts it, to offer a series of connections to others working in the field, hopefully at least one of which will work for you, ring true and make sense. Each of these blog posts you could therefore think of as a possible connection to an idea or a person or to a way of working; lifelines stretched out between things, that anyone can also connect to. Remember, every journey, no matter how long, begins with the placing of just one step in front of another, but sometimes you need a shoulder to lean on if you are to take that next step and that perhaps is the best anyone can offer.

Otobong Nkanga: Search

But back to Otobong Nkanga, and my role as an art educator. There are always questions. How should I introduce her work? It feels important to state that she is from Nigeria and that she mainly works out of Belgium. An image like 'Search' of course makes us think that she is searching for something. This image of a human has a building sitting on top her, a construction that obscures her identity from the observer. This is a giant figure, that stands on one world whilst pointing to another. Is the presumption that this figure is a 'she' the right one? How much of a story do I need to initiate before there is enough of a narrative to help others begin their own interpretation? How much do I need to say? That her feet have sunk down into the ground on which she stands? That white lightening surrounds a newly discovered or revealed other world? That the fact that these are woven textiles creates a very important contextual reading to them?  She in many ways brings together the textile making practices of West Africa and Belgium, but what does that mean?  Or is it enough to simply show an image of her work? By putting her name into this blog's index, have I given her enough status to be worthwhile investigating by you as a student or follower of this blog? Otobong Nkanga is one more artist to add to a growing list, that has come to represent a world wide movement of artists emerging from what were at one time called 'Third World' countries. The old Western art canon has been challenged and we are all asked to redefine what we think contemporary practice is. Not just educators, but museums and art galleries have been required to re-think what their existing or historical curriculums, collections and curatorial strategies represent. As this process goes into action, there will of course be a time of debate, confusion and difficulty, especially for students entering into what was one type of culture and set of established art practices and which is rapidly having to re-define itself. An exciting time, but one full of hidden and very visible dangers. It doesn't seem long ago to myself, that German artists were forced to decide whether or not their art stood for Hitler's National Socialist ideals or whether it was unfit and impure and thus subject to be being ridiculed and burnt. As new and much wider cultural forms enter into contemporary art practice, I hear rumblings and critiques, such as the way that the word 'woke' is now used. Once meaning 'being conscious of racial discrimination in society and other forms of oppression and injustice'. It is now becoming used in a disparaging way, referring to a type of overly liberal progressive orthodoxy, especially one promoting inclusive policies or ideologies that welcome or embrace ethnic, racial, or sexual minorities. This standpoint has led to Brexit, a fear of immigration, a rise of far right politics and a stance that has argued that the new Global orientation of society does not understand or recognise the importance of older more local or national cultural values, which it is further argued, many people still believe in and therefore find it difficult to accommodate or even acknowledge sets of cultural values that have come from other parts of the world or which have emerged in order to acknowledge various struggles with identity. This is a situation many seek to use as a lever for their own political gain. However we must always remember:

"Wherever they burn books, they will in the end burn human beings too". Heinrich Heine

I would never underestimate the power of fear. Change brings with it elevation and new status for some, but always loss of status and fear of redundancy for others. When this happens it is fertile ground for the rise of fascism, and it is instructive to look carefully at why during the 1920s and 30s many people across Europe in their yearning for national unity and strong leadership, turned to an idea that would lay the blame on others for collective economic and spiritual problems; a climate of blame that would eventually lead to the Holocaust. This is why the development of intellectual and spiritual nourishment for all and not just some, should be the key factor when looking at what role art and artists should be undertaking in the future. Above all as an educator I would like to remind the people I work with, that at times we seem to collectively fall morally asleep and that education can help people to wake up from that sleep and support society as a whole in the devising of ways to live, especially approaches to life that accept and value the lives and cultures of others. Teaching art is about far more than art education, it is about looking and as we learn to look we need to take off the social media blinkers and learn to see what is actually going on in front of us. It is also a celebration of the power of speculative futures, of creative possibility and the need to continue playing, especially as we become adults and most of all it can be reminder of the joy of seeing something new and fresh for the first time.

References

Laing, O (2021) Funny Weather: Art in an Emergency Dublin: Picador 

Laing writes for Frieze magazine and is a long running contributor to current debates as to why art matters. By writing across the various art disciplines she makes it very clear that art as it is now experienced is a multi-platform discipline and that sometimes it is the written word that makes most sense and at other times moving images and then at other times static ones. Above all, art for her demonstrates that there are alternative possibilities and that the moments of contemplation that the arts give to us, are much too important to the health of our internal lives for us to ever give them up. 

ART21

Art of Now: Hong Kong Artists 

See also:

Why it matters

Why do we draw?

What use is art?

Drawing as entanglements with life

John Dewey: Art as Experience